THE THING |
||||||||
|
Tracking down a signal, some fun loving Norwegians go barrelling across the frozen Antarctic wastes in a Snow Cat. Along the way they enjoy a dirty joke, hit a hidden crevasse, and almost - but not quite - fall to their doom. While they pass the time enjoying their new perspective on gravity, they shine their lights into the crevasse to see what's down there. Whoa! Back in the good ol' U.S. of A., Adam Goodwin (Eric Christian Olsen: BLACK CAT RUN, CELLULAR) introduces forensic animal scientist grad student, Kate Lloyd (Mary Elizabeth Winstead: THE RING TWO, FINAL DESTINATION 3, GRINDHOUSE: DEATH PROOF) to Dr. Sander Halvorson (Ulrich Thomsen: CENTURION, SEASON OF THE WITCH). Dr. Halvorson explains that Kate needs to leave for Antarctica right now and will she? Kate says sure, let me grab my bag, and away we go on a very slow helicopter ride across the icy landscape. On this flight are two American pilots, Sam Carter (Joel Edgerton) and Jameson (Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje: THE MUMMY RETURNS, THE BOURNE IDENTITY) and this basically introduces us to some of the victims. They get to base and we visit what was buried in the ice, which by this time everyone should know was an alien spacecraft from another world. Oddly enough, this entire scene was shot with such a lack of drama and - what should be - required amazement, that I was left there thinking, 'Gotcha. Spacecraft from another world. Anyhoo...'
Now that problem? The yawning lack of suspense or amazement? It imbues the entire movie. THE THING of 2011 is intended to launch a franchise in a way that both of the earlier movies never did. That was the idea, but Morgan Creek has never launched a successful franchise. They have access to money and they don't know what creativity is or why its important to audiences. With so much riding on this movie and the potential profitable franchise, who had the club-footed idea of hiring a Feature film freshman Director for a $35+ million dollar movie? A guy with only a single short film he directed way back in 1996? It's not like Matthijs has shown any interest in feature film directing at all. So other than to intentionally waste your investor's money, why throw such a big budget at such an unproven person? Especially when there are so many proven Feature Directors who could have easily helmed this movie at this budget? Writer Eric Hessier had a modest web hit with Dionaea House a while back. The upshot of Hollywood's attention over that got him writing credits on the reboot of A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET (2010), FINAL DESTINATION 5, and now THE THING (2011). Sadly for Mr. Hessier, every one of these movies were part of a franchise or an attempt to start or reinvigorate a franchise and all of them are not merely duds, but slaughtered any possibility of starting or keeping the franchise going. Like Heijningen, Hessier could have had a chance if he was allowed to grow his ability instead of getting thrown at such high profile work. For the director and writer, their fall is that much greater and that's just not fair. Producers Marc Abraham (END OF DAYS, DAWN OF THE DEAD (2004), SLITHER, CHILDREN OF MEN, THE LAST EXORCISM) and Eric Newman (DAWN OF THE DEAD (2004), SLITHER, CHILDREN OF MEN, THE LAST EXORCISM) put this together and did a botched job of it. It must be telling that the movie poster announced that THE THING is from the Producers who brought you DAWN OF THE DEAD (2004) and stops there, omitting all that came after. THE THING (2011) is a cheese wheel full of plot holes. Like the alien creatures who demonstrate the ability to move at lightning speed when they want to, and then move slug slow in a wrong-headed attempt to build suspense (or whatever point the film makers were trying to make), which gives the humans a chance to fight or flee them. Cut to a dog chewing through a chain link confinement: That scene made perfect sense in John Carpenter's THE THING when the dogs were clearly terrified in the moment of an attack, choosing to tear up their mouths against metal in an attempt to escape. But when it happens in this movie, nothing has happened yet to impel the dog to do that! It's just, you know, passing doggy time by painfully chewing apart a metal chain link. It's also made clear that these things can fly the spacecraft. So since they understand rudimentary and advanced mechanics, why would they attack the pilots of an aircraft in flight? They should want to get to mass populations (where the aircraft was taking them), that is the point made by the movie (repeatedly, did-diddly-iddly), and they've certainly experienced the danger of crashing before.
As the movie progresses, the plot holes get bigger and start to join and, by the end, the whole flick implodes into the hole under the weight of its own poorly thought out tale and cheese ball CGI. Since AVATAR, there is no more excuse for making unrealistic Computer Graphic Images. Sitting there I knew, I'd been Morgan Creek'd again. At one point, John Carpenter was supposed to be attached in a producer capacity. I can see why he may have pulled out. I feel sorry for nearly everyone involved in making THE THING 2011, practical effects artists, actors, writer, and director included. The only ones I don't pity are the benighted halfwits who green lit and guided this bone-head slopfest all the way to the theaters. Those numbskulls owe me. Two Shriek Girls.
|
|